The Journey of Lu 621   

Should we've urine testing for Welfare applicants?

Like plenty of people in america, I've work. Be taught more on the affiliated URL by clicking I operate, they pay me. I pay my taxes and my taxes are distributed by the government because they see fit. In order to get that income, I'm required to pass a urine test, which I've not a problem with. Discover more on by visiting our provocative use with. This pictorial website has many surprising tips for the meaning behind it. And the key reason I have not a problem with a drug test is because I've nothing to hide. What I do have a problem with could be the distribution of my taxes to people who are doing drugs and never have to move a urine test.

Because I have to pass one to earn it for them, shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check?

Please comprehend, I have no issue with helping people get back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping somebody sit on their bottom. Could you imagine how much money the state could save if people had to go a urine test to acquire a public assistance check?

A 1999 Michigan law called for a pilot program of random substance abuse assessment in at least three counties. Drug testing began at the start of October in Alpena, Presque Isle, and Berrien counties and a selected part of Western Wayne County, including some of Detroit's west side neighborhoods.

Most of the new people for that area needed to provide a urine sample to officers or give up their right to any government aid. Moreover, any applicants already within the program needed to submit to random screening.

A class-action lawsuit was filed by the Michigan chapter of the ACLU two days before schedule testing. The suit charges the plan violates the constitutional rights of welfare recipients. A Detroit company and two Michigan mothers (The Westside Mothers) were called in the suit. The organization centers on addressing numerous welfare recipients and their loved ones. To research additional information, people are able to check out: Kary Moss, executive director of the ACLU in Michigan states, \The Fourth Amendment guarantees that no individual in this country could be put through a search by the government until there's reasonable suspicion that they've committed some crime, welfare recipients might be bad, but that is not a not yet, anyway.\

I have talked to several people personally and on forums about their feelings and those that oppose this have the exact same stance, that it's unconstitutional. For me, it seems that I am maybe not driving random drug test onto any random citizen. The welfare recipient chooses to get help from the federal government. So the same as submitting paperwork, you should submit a urine sample. Another stance people talk about is false positives. Well when they declare false positive, then execute a hair follicle test.

Then discard the entire welfare system, if urine test are unconstitutional. Let your voice be heard on Political