Recently the Federal Communication Commission started considering new guidelines that could make it illegal to publicly access toll-free numbers for private purposes. In the event the FCC has its way, all toll-free telephone numbers will be listed in the directory along with all the related information about who owns them and where they are sometimes found. The dilemma is that many people are leery of exactly what this means and are concerned about how this may affect legitimate free speech and free press. Many businesses and organizations are fighting back and are urging the FCC not to go through with this kind of coverage change. Let us take a look at some of the arguments they are making.
Some argue that since many individuals have accessed toll free numbers in their computers to reach areas such as the White House or the State Department, there's no general public interest in having them recorded. Those amounts are just there for convenience and don't promote any form of business or organization. Second, the fact that many people join numbers like the White House's 800 Phone Numbers As You Desire, and dial up those to call in for private reasons, does not mean they always wish to discuss their schedule along with different folks. Those amounts have nothing to do with the functioning of government.
Then, you will find the telecommunication companies. The ones that offer cell phones for free, despite the fact that they're already recorded as toll free numbers, don't want to watch them banned for having promoted their solutions for immoral purposes. And do not believe for a second that the federal obscenity laws apply to these cellular numbers. Again, those are merely listed for convenience, and there is not any legal reason to restrict them from speaking to other individuals.
Following that, there are the cell phone carriers. They view this judgment as a opportunity to challenge the telecommunications businesses and providers of paid calling plans in their own contracts and billing services. These companies argue that by banning paid calling plans, they're only being forced to provide their subscribers with less than ideal support. And that may be true. But if the court allows the telecommunication organizations to ban amounts linea erotica, they could also sue to block access to the Internet, which is mainly blocked throughout the nation from several private websites for exactly the very same reasons.
Maybe above all, all of this comes back to the inability of the federal government to stop its citizens from dialing up disgusting amounts to begin with. This has been an ongoing issue, and it seems likely that we'll see more of the in the future. But what's currently on the books might be easily changed. The question is whether the members of congress that are behind these measures really think that they're doing the proper thing for the United States of America.
So the partial protection to this predicament is that Congress can not change anything, because the Constitution already provides them the capability to do it. However, that only holds true if the members of congress actually believe in the founding principles of our country. When they don't, well, the Department of Justice will be on their way to submitting a suit to force them to document against the businesses which do provide a true alternative to the adult marketing industry.